Recommendations for Assessing the Effects of the DOI Hurricane Sandy Mitigation and Resilience Program on Ecological System and Infrastructure Resilience in the Northeast Coastal Region

You are here

Home > Initiatives > Case Studies > Recommendations for Assessing the Effects of the DOI Hurricane Sandy Mitigation and Resilience Program on Ecological System and Infrastructure Resilience in the Northeast Coastal Region

Browse by:

Sector

Country

Region

Theme

Organisation

Tell us how you used this resourceSuggest a green growth resource
June 2015
Source: 
Department of the Interior (DOI)

This report represents the first phase of the Department of the Interior (DOI) assessment effort for Hurricane Sandy projects. It was developed for DOI by a metrics expert group of physical and ecological scientists and socioeconomic experts who recommended performance metrics for measuring changes in resilience resulting from the DOI-sponsored projects. It identifies natural and artificial coastal features most affected by Hurricane Sandy along the northeast coast, including marshes, beaches, and estuaries, and recommends metrics that would indicate resilience changes in those features.

As recommended in this report, a follow-up study by Abt Associates supplements this information by incorporating metrics to address potential socio-economic impacts resulting from the DOI-sponsored projects.

Read Online
Country: 
United States of America
Themes: 
Natural Capital, Risk and Resilience
Key search terms: 
natural capital, disaster management, disaster resilience, disaster response

Related Case Studies

December 2015

Developing Socio-Economic Metrics to Measure DOI Hurricane Sandy Project and Program Outcomes

Abt Associates
This report details a framework established by the United States Department of Interior (DOI) to evaluate the success of 162 of its resilience-focused projects. Building on a previous report that developed performance metrics to measure changes in ecological resilience resulting from the projects, this report focuses on the incorporation of metrics to address socio-economic impacts resulting from the DOI-sponsored projects. These metrics will be used to evaluate projects both individually and across larger scales, with the aim to inform best practices, address knowledge gaps, sustain and enhance improvements in coastal resilience, and further community competence and empowerment.
January 2007

Full-cost Accounting of Coastal Disasters in the United States: Implications for Planning and Preparedness

This paper aims to identify the costs of coastal disasters in relation to human, social, built, and natural capital as well as their associated services at the local site of the disaster and in the regions and nations that respond for relief and recovery. It examines how, compared to typical cost accounting, disaster planning and preparedness becomes more cost effective when the full cost of disasters is calculated. A full-cost accounting also sets the stage for rigorous comparisons of strategies for post-disaster development.
July 2014

Genuine Progress Indicator

Global Green Growth Institute (GGGI), Green Growth Best Practice (GGBP)
The Genuine Progress Indicator is a metric that has been suggested to replace, or supplement, gross domestic product as a measure of economic welfare.
February 2018

Investing in Natural and Nature-Based Infrastructure: Building Better Along our Coasts

This case study advocates for the incorporation of natural and nature-based infrastructure (NNBI) methodologies into coastal infrastructure projects in the United States to ensure the dual goals of the safety of coastal communities and the sustainment and restoration of ecosystem functions along coasts.