The Asia-Pacific region is one of the most rapidly urbanising regions in the world. Currently, seven of the world‘s mega-cities (cities with populations of 10 million or more) are located in Asia-Pacific. However, by 2025 there will be 21 mega-cities in the region. With three out of four Asia-Pacific countries already experiencing water scarcity, urban centres in the region will face threats to urban water security as a result of climate change and the various impacts of urbanisation, where urban water security is the ability of a population to access good quality water of suf¬ficient quantity necessary for sustaining livelihoods, human well-being and socio-economic development.
Climate change is likely to decrease urban water security in the Asia-Pacific region, with increases in the frequency and magnitude of floods and droughts. In particular, flooding will decrease the availability of good quality water through contamination of surface and groundwater supplies, while droughts decrease the quantity of water available and increase demand for water for cooling and drinking. Climate change is projected to impact on urban water security in the following ways:
The Asia-Pacific region is one of the most rapidly urbanising regions in the world, with urban populations growing at 2.3% per annum compared to the global average of 2%. Currently, there are 10 mega-cities in the region (cities with 10 million or more residents). This will increase to 21 by 2025 leading to significantly increased demand for water resources. In addition, water quality is threatened by land-use changes that degrade ecosystems, as well as increased pollution. Patterns of urbanisation are projected to impact water security in a number of ways:
For all of these reasons, the Asia-Pacific region will be characterised by growing water scarcity over the coming decades, and policymakers will need to make full use of demand management techniques to mitigate these challenges, where demand management involves better use of existing water supplies before plans are made to further increase supply. In particular, demand management promotes water conservation, during times of both normal conditions and uncertainty, through changes in practices, cultures and people’s attitudes towards water resources. In addition to the environmental benefits of preserving ecosystems and their habitats, demand management is cost-effective compared to supply-side management because it allows the better allocation of scarce financial resources, which would otherwise be required to build expensive dams and water transfer schemes from one river basin to another.
The opinions expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official views of the GGKP or its Partners.